The LSW Zine: A Call for Rants, Manifestos, Articles, and Artwork
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 9:03 am
Announcing the Library Society of the World Zine, a planned dead-tree compilation of writing about libraries by library people.
If all goes well, when librarians gather in Chicago in July of 2009 for the American Library Association Annual Meeting, LSW agents will be packing copies of the first ever issue of the LSW zine along with their “FRBR? I hardly knew her!” t-shirts and Roy Tennant thongs. We will then sell or otherwise distribute the zines to an unwary population of humid, bus-riding librarians.
If at this point you are asking, “what’s a zine?” I’ll just say briefly that it is a small-circulation magazine-style publication, often photocopied and produced on the cheap. If you want to know more about zines, I refer you to the Barnard College Library Zine Collection and to the Wikipedia entry for “zine.”
This particular zine will be a collection of work by many people, including, I hope, YOU. Here is what I am thinking so far:
- Articles or artwork should be your own work, not previously published (though some collage or “found” submissions would also be welcome).
- Pseudonyms are fine.
- Personal attacks are not fine.
- The LSW Zine will not get you tenure, so save the longitudinal studies and the content analyses for the Journal of Tedious Librarianship (though parodies of such articles would be great).
- Cursing is fine. Keep that in mind if you don’t like cursing,. Your submission will inevitably be next to someone who does like cursing. A lot.
- Keep it fairly short. A one-to-five page submission is more likely to be published than a twenty page monster.
- Keep it on the personal level. What do you love or hate about libraries? What gets you excited? Tell us about you worst day on the job or the day it all clicked. What is in your desk drawer? Draw the magic library unicorn. Who would win a Texas Cage Match, Meredith Farkas or Sandy Berman (assume Farkas isn’t pregnant and Berman can use whatever subject headings he chooses)? Just keep it personal and specific.
- I, Steve Lawson, am the editor, and while I aim to be inclusive, it’s entirely possible I won’t be able to accept everything submitted. You are welcome to start your own zine titled “Steve Lawson is a Tool.”
- The zine will be black-and-white, probably photocopied, and “half-letter” size (or the size you get when you fold a US Letter Size sheet of paper in half, or 5.5 x 8.5 in.). It will as many pages long as it takes, though the cost of printing will be a factor in how long we can let it get (see below).
- In the grand tradition of the author-pays publishing model, authors will be expected to help print the zine, either by being responsible for making a certain number of copies or kicking in a certain amount of money. I haven’t really figured this out yet, but if you aren’t willing to spend $10 – $20 to get this thing printed, please don’t submit. (If $10 – $20 is a legitimate hardship for you, please let me know and we will work something out.)
- I expect to have two deadlines: those people who just want to submit raw text and/or images and leave it up to me (and, I hope, the lovely and talented Tim Keneipp) to design the pages will need to get things in a little sooner. Those who want to go the whole nine yards and design their own 5.5 x 8.5 in. pages can hold out until a little later. In any case, ALA is in mid-July, so expect to see deadlines in April and May to leave time to print the crazy thing.
- ALA Annual is merely a convenient deadline, far enough away to make this all seem plausible, and a time when many of us will actually be in close physical proximity. The American Library Association has nothing to do with this zine.
- Will we sell it? Give it away? How would we handle collecting money? What format should submissions be in? Is anyone going to want this thing anyway? Will Michael Gorman have a column? Answer: That all remains to be determined.
Will this work? Heck if I know. But it should be fun to try. Leave a comment on this post or email steve at stevelawson dot name if you want in.
[Cross-posted to Humbug! The LSW Blog.]

Oh, you know I’m in!
Comment by joshua m. neff — December 10, 2008 @ 9:57 am
hellz to the yes.
i want in.
Comment by amy — December 10, 2008 @ 10:51 am
I hope you’re serious about the FRBR t-shirts. Not so jazzed about the RT Thong however.
Once I get the latter image out of my head, I’ll start working on that Longitudinal Study for you. The more stats the better, right?
Comment by Tom — December 10, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
Strange but true: the FRBR shirts I made up, while the RT thong was briefly (heh) available from Cafe Press in early 2006.
And Tom, you better have a Z axis or two on those graphs
Comment by Steve Lawson — December 10, 2008 @ 12:46 pm
w00t! And thanks for the link to Barnard.
btw, I’m printing this out and mailing it to Sandy Berman. I bet he’ll want to contribute.
Comment by Jenna — December 10, 2008 @ 1:00 pm
Jenna, it would be so cool if Sandy and you contributed. I still need to hit up Jason Kucsma personally, too.
Comment by Steve Lawson — December 10, 2008 @ 2:54 pm
What?! it won’t get me tenure?
You’re all my peers, so this could be a peer-reviewed zine.
Couldn’t it? :)
Comment by Aaron the Librarian — December 10, 2008 @ 6:44 pm
yep, totally in.
Comment by megvsmeg — December 10, 2008 @ 6:54 pm
Did Xette give you my suggested title? “The Peerless Review”? Badump-cha.
Comment by megvsmeg — December 10, 2008 @ 6:56 pm
In, I’m.
Comment by jessamyn — December 10, 2008 @ 7:49 pm
One of my professors in Library School sent this to me. I’m trying to decide quite how to take that… Are we allowed if we’re still in library school? I do work in a library, though I gleefully turned in my notice, so maybe I can’t count, because I’m not a “real” librarian.
By the way, are we allowed to write about the inequities of “real” librarians getting paid twice as much (but still too little) to do very little while “paraprofessionals” know more, do more and get paid half as much? Or is that not kosher even in this setting?
Comment by George G — December 11, 2008 @ 1:27 am
I was thinking I might try to catalogue roy tennant’s moustache. or better yet, record the some of the ephemeral moments of my life using marc fields. would rda be appropriate in this case? dc? this is really a question of standards, right?
Comment by sam generoux — December 11, 2008 @ 6:10 am
Roy Tennant thong artwork:
http://lackoftalent.org/tmp/s25714592_812.jpg
Comment by mjgiarlo — December 11, 2008 @ 6:14 am
Of course you HAD to bring up the thong. ;-)
Comment by Roy Tennant — December 11, 2008 @ 8:08 am
Glad to see more people interested.
@megvsmeg: I like that title. I think we will need to keep a list of possible titles and choose one at a later date. I also like “Charmingly Archaic” from last night’s Uncontrolled Vocabulary.
@George G: I’m not your daddy, so the question isn’t “are we allowed” but “would you publish” and the answer is “yes, especially if you can manage to write it in such a way that you don’t sound like a petulant child.”
@sam: Roy has said that MARC is dead (though perhaps he recanted on that one?) so perhaps you need to devise a mustache-specific standard. The more standards, the better, what I always say.
@mjgiarlo: Thank you for providing the link to the artwork. Did anyone actually buy the thong or is that a CafePress ghost? I will pay ten Canadian dollars for a photo of someone actually wearing a Roy Tennant thong plus a signed, notarized release so I can publish said photo in the zine.
@Roy: If you send a photo of yourself in the RT thong, I’ll make it twenty Canadian dollars. Think about it.
Comment by Steve Lawson — December 11, 2008 @ 9:17 am
I’d pay to see this in print:
http://www.geocities.com/effinglibrarian/yes.png
Comment by the.effing.librarian — December 11, 2008 @ 10:04 am
Steve,
Thanks for the offer, but there unfortunately isn’t enough money printed to pay restitution to those who would be irreparably damaged by such a sight. ;-)
Comment by Roy Tennant — December 11, 2008 @ 12:18 pm
@Steve
I am a baaad librarian, for I forget the provenance of said image. I think it’s a photoshop job. I would think that for fifty Canadian dollars, Roy would print the image out and paste it to himself.
Comment by mjgiarlo — December 12, 2008 @ 7:07 am
I’m in but not sure what I’ll do, but you knew that.
Comment by Jessy — December 12, 2008 @ 2:05 pm
I’m in if you want art or comics.
Comment by DerikB — December 12, 2008 @ 2:48 pm
I am in, and would be on hand for any variety of copying/folding/stapling and mailing help that may be required.
Comment by Alycia — December 14, 2008 @ 5:28 pm
I’ve really been missing my zinester girl days. Count me in!
Comment by Anne — December 14, 2008 @ 8:45 pm
count me in.
Comment by Caroline — December 15, 2008 @ 11:28 am
Hey Steve, are you accepting work from Aussies?
– CW, in Perth, Western Australia
Comment by CW — December 16, 2008 @ 7:19 pm
It’s fun to see so many people interested in participating. We should have something good by July, I believe.
CW, sure, Aussies welcome!
Comment by Steve Lawson — December 17, 2008 @ 9:22 am
Oh boy, I can’t wait! Now I just have to write something…
Comment by lia — December 18, 2008 @ 10:13 am
I’ve got something. Let me know how to submit!
Comment by sarah — January 13, 2009 @ 8:55 am
Sarah, I sent you email. Anyone with contributions can email me at steve at stevelawson.name.
Comment by Steve — January 15, 2009 @ 9:17 am
I am seriously behind on my blog reading. This is a great idea. Now I have to figure out if I have anything worth saying and time to say it.
Comment by Kaijsa — January 29, 2009 @ 1:02 am
[...] The idea is alive and well. I still have every intention of having the first issue of the Library Society of the World zine ready for ALA Annual in July. (If you have no idea what I’m talking about, try reading this earlier post, The LSW Zine: a Call for Rants, Manifestos, articles and artwork.) [...]
Pingback by See Also… » The LSW zine: articles due May 31 — April 30, 2009 @ 2:02 pm