<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When good sites go bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html</link>
	<description>a library weblog by Steve Lawson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lawson</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html#comment-534</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say I &quot;half agree with Dorothea,&quot; too. It is true that it is certainly easier to pick up stakes with social software than with an &lt;abbr title=&quot;Integrated Library System&quot;&gt;ILS&lt;/abbr&gt;, and many such transitions would be pretty painless. 

But if you have built a whole service or approach around a site, or if you have imprinted that URL on staff or patrons&#039; minds through extensive PR, then switching could be a little less seamless that it would be for an event like Five Weeks.

The Flickr thing was particularly bizarre, and (let&#039;s hope!) unique. Once incident like that won&#039;t deter &lt;em&gt;me&lt;/em&gt; from using it, but my library is relatively tolerant of such risks. Many/most others are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say I &#8220;half agree with Dorothea,&#8221; too. It is true that it is certainly easier to pick up stakes with social software than with an <abbr title="Integrated Library System">ILS</abbr>, and many such transitions would be pretty painless. </p>
<p>But if you have built a whole service or approach around a site, or if you have imprinted that URL on staff or patrons&#8217; minds through extensive PR, then switching could be a little less seamless that it would be for an event like Five Weeks.</p>
<p>The Flickr thing was particularly bizarre, and (let&#8217;s hope!) unique. Once incident like that won&#8217;t deter <em>me</em> from using it, but my library is relatively tolerant of such risks. Many/most others are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennimi</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>jennimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html#comment-532</guid>
		<description>As someone who has just finally made the move from WP for free to hosting my own, I agree with Walt.  The flickr FUBAR this weekend REALLY made me nervous, and as much as they say they weren&#039;t hacked (and I LOVE flickr and want to believe they&#039;ll always be truthful to me) logon &quot;security&quot; messages of late already had me in a OliverStonian state of skepticism.  I wonder....

I often use flickr to post photos for jennimi.  I &lt;em&gt;pay for my account&lt;/em&gt;, I do not use the free version. I like the interface and two point oh boy of it, and am used to my routine.  I know what I am doing and that makes me feel good.  But after what happened this weekend (I had porn show up in some of my sets thumbnails) I am even more happy I chose to host jennimi&#039;s important photos directly on my server space (header images, for ex.). 

What interests me about my own reaction to seeing these random photos show up was how nervous and emotional I got.  My heart was racing and I almost had a panic attack!  Sure, I have chosen to put myself &quot;out there&quot; through blogging and other sites.  I personally have resolved not to be anonymous online.  This comes with its own set of introspection emergencies at times.  

As a result, I sometimes kick myself for a tone that came off incorrectly, or writing something snarky because I was having a bad day.  But it&#039;s always been MY content, MY representation of myself, and I can correct tone, or go back and remove snark I didn&#039;t really mean.  But there was NOTHING I could do but wait and see here.  And hope my loyal readers know I&#039;d never post those pics (though I don&#039;t want to take away someone ELSE&#039;S right to do their thing....).   I had thoughts of deleting sets!  Sure, I have my hard copies backed up... but effort (artistic, familial, intellectual, carpal) has gone into the creation of my flickr identity.  Do I have any final decision about leaving flickr or not posting so much?  Nah... but I will probably phase out my use of linking rather than hosting photos, at least for awhile.  Darn, too.  I really like that feature....

Excellent post.  Bloglines is a whole other issue.... but I&#039;m rambled on far too long already.  - jenn graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has just finally made the move from WP for free to hosting my own, I agree with Walt.  The flickr FUBAR this weekend REALLY made me nervous, and as much as they say they weren&#8217;t hacked (and I LOVE flickr and want to believe they&#8217;ll always be truthful to me) logon &#8220;security&#8221; messages of late already had me in a OliverStonian state of skepticism.  I wonder&#8230;.</p>
<p>I often use flickr to post photos for jennimi.  I <em>pay for my account</em>, I do not use the free version. I like the interface and two point oh boy of it, and am used to my routine.  I know what I am doing and that makes me feel good.  But after what happened this weekend (I had porn show up in some of my sets thumbnails) I am even more happy I chose to host jennimi&#8217;s important photos directly on my server space (header images, for ex.). </p>
<p>What interests me about my own reaction to seeing these random photos show up was how nervous and emotional I got.  My heart was racing and I almost had a panic attack!  Sure, I have chosen to put myself &#8220;out there&#8221; through blogging and other sites.  I personally have resolved not to be anonymous online.  This comes with its own set of introspection emergencies at times.  </p>
<p>As a result, I sometimes kick myself for a tone that came off incorrectly, or writing something snarky because I was having a bad day.  But it&#8217;s always been MY content, MY representation of myself, and I can correct tone, or go back and remove snark I didn&#8217;t really mean.  But there was NOTHING I could do but wait and see here.  And hope my loyal readers know I&#8217;d never post those pics (though I don&#8217;t want to take away someone ELSE&#8217;S right to do their thing&#8230;.).   I had thoughts of deleting sets!  Sure, I have my hard copies backed up&#8230; but effort (artistic, familial, intellectual, carpal) has gone into the creation of my flickr identity.  Do I have any final decision about leaving flickr or not posting so much?  Nah&#8230; but I will probably phase out my use of linking rather than hosting photos, at least for awhile.  Darn, too.  I really like that feature&#8230;.</p>
<p>Excellent post.  Bloglines is a whole other issue&#8230;. but I&#8217;m rambled on far too long already.  &#8211; jenn graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html#comment-529</guid>
		<description>I half agree with Dorothea--but if a library has used Flickr as part of public relations, there will be significant damage from random porn shots before a switch to something else--and, of course, it&#039;s pretty much impossible to retroactively change. (Right now, there&#039;s twice as much traffic to cites.boisestate.edu as to citesandinsights.info, even though nothing new has appeared at the former in seven months...)

Part of this is &quot;you get what you pay for.&quot; I&#039;d be more confident in a blog using WordPress software that&#039;s hosted at a leased domain/server than I would in a WordPress.com blog, for example--the &quot;free&quot; software&#039;s fine, but doing everything on someone else&#039;s dime leaves you at someone else&#039;s mercy. 

Exit strategies sound good. I suspect most of us are less careful about maintaining them than we should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I half agree with Dorothea&#8211;but if a library has used Flickr as part of public relations, there will be significant damage from random porn shots before a switch to something else&#8211;and, of course, it&#8217;s pretty much impossible to retroactively change. (Right now, there&#8217;s twice as much traffic to cites.boisestate.edu as to citesandinsights.info, even though nothing new has appeared at the former in seven months&#8230;)</p>
<p>Part of this is &#8220;you get what you pay for.&#8221; I&#8217;d be more confident in a blog using WordPress software that&#8217;s hosted at a leased domain/server than I would in a WordPress.com blog, for example&#8211;the &#8220;free&#8221; software&#8217;s fine, but doing everything on someone else&#8217;s dime leaves you at someone else&#8217;s mercy. </p>
<p>Exit strategies sound good. I suspect most of us are less careful about maintaining them than we should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothea</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/02/when_good_sites_go_bad.html#comment-527</guid>
		<description>The difference, I think, is the ease in shifting from one software tool to another. When Bloglines threw a wobbly, it wasn&#039;t a big deal -- we told people about Google Reader.

We originally had a lot of our stuff on Odeo. Odeo threw a wobbly. So we moved to blip.tv. As long as the social-softwaresphere keeps from becoming a monopoly, I&#039;m of the opinion we&#039;ll be okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference, I think, is the ease in shifting from one software tool to another. When Bloglines threw a wobbly, it wasn&#8217;t a big deal &#8212; we told people about Google Reader.</p>
<p>We originally had a lot of our stuff on Odeo. Odeo threw a wobbly. So we moved to blip.tv. As long as the social-softwaresphere keeps from becoming a monopoly, I&#8217;m of the opinion we&#8217;ll be okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

