<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drama vs. criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html</link>
	<description>a library weblog by Steve Lawson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lawson</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting a dozen spammy comments per day on this one post. Time to close comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting a dozen spammy comments per day on this one post. Time to close comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lis.dom &#187; in defense of the dinky library, among other things</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>lis.dom &#187; in defense of the dinky library, among other things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-428</guid>
		<description>[...] That said, though, in the spirit of honesty before politeness and of writing in my own blog instead of just commenting on other peoples&#8217;, here&#8217;s my little rant about one of last week&#8217;s memes, the suckiness of the physical library space. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That said, though, in the spirit of honesty before politeness and of writing in my own blog instead of just commenting on other peoples&#8217;, here&#8217;s my little rant about one of last week&#8217;s memes, the suckiness of the physical library space. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Overholt</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>John Overholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Staying out of no-win religious wars? That&#039;s like 40% of all blog content! If we all did that the internet would be nothing but tumbleweeds and dust. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staying out of no-win religious wars? That&#8217;s like 40% of all blog content! If we all did that the internet would be nothing but tumbleweeds and dust. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Iris, I went for the trifecta on Rochelle&#039;s post: I made a smartass comment, then wrote this post on my blog, then made another (slightly less smartass) comment on Tinfoil + Raccoon.

Eat snark? &lt;strong&gt;Eat snark and die!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Iris, I went for the trifecta on Rochelle&#8217;s post: I made a smartass comment, then wrote this post on my blog, then made another (slightly less smartass) comment on Tinfoil + Raccoon.</p>
<p>Eat snark? <strong>Eat snark and die!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-425</guid>
		<description>You are very right, John.  I didn&#039;t mean to say that I think comments are bad, or that substantive disagreement can&#039;t happen in the comments.

Perhaps the problem I was writing about is too personal; it&#039;s really about the way &lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt; have written a few comments, not about comments in general

What I mean to say is that I will sometimes write things that are more obnoxious in comments than I will here. For example, I was willing to say in the comments on the Tame the Web post &lt;a href=&quot;http://tametheweb.com/2006/11/the_shifted_librarian_on_those.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Shifted Librarian on those Pesky Cell Phones&lt;/a&gt; that I thought Jenny Levine had sunk to self-parody and schoolmarmish scolding, something I wouldn&#039;t post to this blog. That&#039;s the kind of thing I&#039;m saying I won&#039;t do anymore.

Another sort of resolution is to not get involved in discussions that I either really don&#039;t care that much about or that are no-win religious wars. So no more comments from me about &quot;bad signs&quot; or cell phones in libraries. They get me too worked up over things that aren&#039;t really all that important to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very right, John.  I didn&#8217;t mean to say that I think comments are bad, or that substantive disagreement can&#8217;t happen in the comments.</p>
<p>Perhaps the problem I was writing about is too personal; it&#8217;s really about the way <strong>I</strong> have written a few comments, not about comments in general</p>
<p>What I mean to say is that I will sometimes write things that are more obnoxious in comments than I will here. For example, I was willing to say in the comments on the Tame the Web post <a href="http://tametheweb.com/2006/11/the_shifted_librarian_on_those.html" rel="nofollow">The Shifted Librarian on those Pesky Cell Phones</a> that I thought Jenny Levine had sunk to self-parody and schoolmarmish scolding, something I wouldn&#8217;t post to this blog. That&#8217;s the kind of thing I&#8217;m saying I won&#8217;t do anymore.</p>
<p>Another sort of resolution is to not get involved in discussions that I either really don&#8217;t care that much about or that are no-win religious wars. So no more comments from me about &#8220;bad signs&#8221; or cell phones in libraries. They get me too worked up over things that aren&#8217;t really all that important to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an idea: comment AND blog post.  That&#039;s the one-two punch of conversation building.  I almost never follow lists and lists of trackbacks, but I do read comments.  That way you can have your snark and eat it too... ewww ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an idea: comment AND blog post.  That&#8217;s the one-two punch of conversation building.  I almost never follow lists and lists of trackbacks, but I do read comments.  That way you can have your snark and eat it too&#8230; ewww ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Overholt</title>
		<link>http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html/comment-page-1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>John Overholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevelawson.name/seealso/archives/2007/01/drama_vs_criticism.html#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Fan though I am of flaming snark, I&#039;ll grant that substantive disagreement is usually an improvement. But I don&#039;t at all follow your argument that you can&#039;t acomplish that in a comment on another site. If you really want to label a behavior as cowardly (although I think it&#039;s a vast exaggeration in either instance), it&#039;s not being willing to say what you&#039;re thinking to the author&#039;s face, as it were.

Maybe it&#039;s a distinction without a difference, but I can&#039;t help feel that comments are what make the blogosphere (sorry) a sphere, in a way that trackbacks don&#039;t quite.

/says the man with comments turned off on his blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fan though I am of flaming snark, I&#8217;ll grant that substantive disagreement is usually an improvement. But I don&#8217;t at all follow your argument that you can&#8217;t acomplish that in a comment on another site. If you really want to label a behavior as cowardly (although I think it&#8217;s a vast exaggeration in either instance), it&#8217;s not being willing to say what you&#8217;re thinking to the author&#8217;s face, as it were.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a distinction without a difference, but I can&#8217;t help feel that comments are what make the blogosphere (sorry) a sphere, in a way that trackbacks don&#8217;t quite.</p>
<p>/says the man with comments turned off on his blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

